Battlefield 6 (Campaign)

I didn’t have particularly high expectations for the Campaign of Battlefield 6. I figured it would be a perfectly fine – if forgettable – experience. Turns out, I was wrong. I should have set my expectations even lower because the Campaign of Battlefield 6 isn’t just forgettable – it’s just bad.

Now, you might say it doesn’t really matter – that nobody is playing Battlefield 6 for the Campaign. But the fact is, the Campaign is part of the package you’re paying for and as such, it’s fair game for review.

The Campaign consists of nine missions and took me about 4-5 hours to complete on the hardest difficulty, although that time didn’t include hunting down the collectible Dog Tags. So let’s start with the story – the Campaign opens with a conflict breaking out between NATO and the PAX Armata – a global, private military force.

You’ll play as a select few characters throughout the missions as you fight to thwart the nefarious plans of PAX – you only ever see the conflict from the NATO side, which is kind of a shame, because PAX could have been a more interesting and morally / politically complex force than just the ‘bad guys doing bad things’ they end up being.

The missions are framed as flashbacks to events prior in the conflict as the story tries to inject a rather trite ‘CIA conspiracy’ angle into things. It’s all complete nonsense, of course, and totally unnecessary. It certainly doesn’t add anything to the story because the Campaign ends right when you ‘expose’ the truth. Sort of. Maybe. I don’t know. None of it really makes any sense if you stop to think about it.

The characters are of the ‘Oorah!’ variety, all very serious, all very ‘Oorah!’. I don’t really mind that though – I mean, it’s exactly what I expected. And even if the story is kind of shit, I wouldn’t care so much about that either if the missions themselves were fun.

Oh dear. The missions just aren’t very fun at all. I thought the Campaign might see you switch between characters that represent the different MP classes – Assault, Recon, Support and Engineer – giving you a taste of each and their associated abilities / gadgets. It – sort of – does this, but it doesn’t really commit to it and a lot of the abilities / gadgets of MP aren’t available at all.

This is also true of vehicles. Aside from a single mission in which you get to drive a tank (and a pretty dull mission at that) there’s practically no vehicle use in the campaign. I’m not asking for the entire Campaign to serve as a general tutorial for the MP, but I’d expect it to at least reflect all aspects of the MP experience.

Where’s the helicopter mission? Or the jet mission? There aren’t any! The only moments you get in a helicopter are entirely scripted. In fact, most vehicle use is just you locked into a static turret section. A Battlefield Campaign should play to the strengths of Battlefield – large scale battles, lots of vehicles, combined arms – instead, the Campaign plays out like a really bad, heavily scripted Call of Duty campaign.

The mission design is generally poor and feels like something ripped out of a bog-standard military shooter released 20 years ago. The destruction physics, like the vehicles, are barely utilised, and the AI is absolutely atrocious. I can’t recall the last time I saw AI this bad in a shooter.

I just don’t get the point of it. It doesn’t serve as a good tutorial for MP in terms of classes, skills, gadgets or vehicles and it doesn’t reflect the Battlefield ‘experience’ in terms of large scale battles or combined arms. It barely utilises the impressive destruction physics when – in a scripted campaign – it could have done so in some truly exciting ways. The story is bad and the AI is terrible.

Even if you already own Battlefield 6 it’s hard to recommend bothering with the campaign unless you want those collectible achievements. And if the Campaign was one of the main reasons you were thinking of picking it up – don’t. Seriously, don’t.

Now Playing: Deliver At All Costs

In Deliver At All Costs you play as Winston, a young man who takes a job at the ‘We Deliver’ courier service, tasked with making various deliveries throughout a 1950s-esque American world, one in which nearly everything can be driven through, into, over and destroyed.

I was expecting an isometric Crazy Taxi style experience, with timed missions in which your goal is to – as the title suggests – deliver at all costs by ignoring the roads and ploughing through anything that gets in your way. But sadly, that’s not what I got.

The first thing that surprised me about Deliver At All Costs was how many cut-scenes there were and how prominent the story was in the experience. I didn’t see this is a bad surprise – at least initially – because I was curious to see how the story would play out.

But within the first few hours of play, I found myself growing rather sick of it, feeling that I was spending as much – if not more – of my time watching (rather dull) cut-scenes than actually playing the game. To make matters worse, the game forces you to tediously drive to and from work between every mission or two.

It’s a repetitive and frankly unnecessary journey that feels like it exists purely to pad out what is already a fairly meagre quantity of content. I was spending more time driving to work and back again between missions than I was actually playing the missions themselves.

And the missions suck for the most part. It’s not like there’s no fun to be found here, but every time I did start what felt like a fun mission, the game ruined it by needlessly dragging the mission out by forcing me to do the same, repetitive task several times in a row.

The mission I probably enjoyed the most involved towing a ‘bomb shelter’ (shaped more like a wrecking ball) to a property and watching as it flung itself through buildings and smashed over cars like something out of the ending of Fast 5. But even that mission is marred by the game continually redirecting you to yet another location to the point of tedium.

 

And then you get a lot of missions that really aren’t fun at all – like one where you’ve got to tediously ‘catch’ boxes that fall from the sky and the game wants you to do it several times in several different locations.

Or there’s the mission I hated the most that sees you transporting a bomb on the back of your truck and even the slightest of knocks causes it to explode. In a game with rather wonky driving, the mission was tedious as f**k to get through because even a tiny knock kills you and forces you to watch the same ‘comedic’ cut-scene before re-spawning (thankfully) somewhat nearby.

I’ve used the word ‘tedious’ or a variation of it a lot already in this review because that’s how I can best sum up my experience of playing Deliver At All Costs. I feel like there’s a really fun, simple and more arcade-like experience buried here beneath layers of boring story, pointless back and forth travel and dull as dishes mission design.

You also realise quite early on that the ‘destruction’ aspect really is just a gimmick that’s more detrimental to your experience than transformative. Sure, you can plough through a building on your way from A to B but chances are, it will only slow you down if not stop you entirely when you get stuck on some piece of fallen scenery.

There’s also a lot of environmental pieces that can’t be destroyed, and it’s quite easy to get your car totally stuck forcing you to go into a menu to re-spawn nearby. So in the end, you learn that sticking to the roads and avoiding driving through, into or over anything leads to a smoother, less irritating and more enjoyable experience – which kind of defeats the entire point of the game.

After about 2 hours playing Deliver At All Costs I thought I might just give up because I really wasn’t enjoying it, but I decided to persist and see if the game improved. Spoiler: it didn’t. I started skipping most of the cut-scenes but I saw enough to know the direction the story takes is absolute nonsense.

The game is split into 3 acts, the first of which is the longest, and then the next two are both pretty short. The last is only 3 missions. I finished the game with about 5 hours clocked, but if I hadn’t been skipping so many of those boring cut-scenes it might have been 10.

Overall, Deliver At All Costs isn’t a game I can recommend. I got it for free on Epic and honestly, even if you got it for free too, I’d say don’t waste your time with it. It’s a game that doesn’t seem to know what it wants to be. I kind of hated most of my time playing it aside from those very, very occasional moments in a mission when I suddenly realised I was having fun. But those moments are fleeting and don’t last very long.

4/10

Gallery: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33

Now Playing: Lethal Company

Lethal Company is a co-op focused sci-fi survival horror game in which you play as employees of ‘The Company’ who send you and up to three friends to various moons to collect, return and sell scrap. You have a set quota to meet within three days. Hit that quota and you can continue on to the next. Don’t hit it and . . . you’ll see what happens.

Every time you visit a moon (even the same moon) the facility you’ll be searching for scrap is randomised so you never know the exact layout, what kind of scrap you’ll find or what kind of nasty creatures lurk within. The randomisation doesn’t always feel fair – I’ve died upon first entering a facility because a creature or lethal trap is just on the other side of the door.

But that random element and just how unforgiving Lethal Company is does give the game a unique sort of charm. I can’t imagine ever wanting to try playing this solo. This is a game designed for co-op because those bad rolls of the dice are where you’ll likely find the most funny and unexpected moments.

It’s undoubtedly repetitive, however, even with the randomisation. The facilities you enter tend to all look alike and follow the same basic structure. There is progression in the sense that as you sell more scrap you can also purchase more equipment to improve your chances of success, but everything resets once you miss that first quota sending you straight back to square one.

And you’ll probably be missing your quota a lot early on so that means a lot of restarts. Sometimes you just get a bad run of luck as the game decides to generate the most hostile facility imaginable and there’s little you can do about it. It can be frustrating but, provided you’re playing with friends, you probably won’t care too much as long as you’re having fun.

And there is a lot of fun to be had in Lethal Company, mostly from your (nearly always) lethal encounters with the weird creatures that inhabit the facilities. You never know what you’re going to find and I’m still encountering all kinds of new weird shit every time we start a fresh run.

I’m not convinced by the longevity of the title, not without a more permanent progression system (an option would be nice) or a wider variety of randomised facility types, but it’s the kind of game I’m happy to drop into now and then to mess about with a friend. We chat, we laugh, we die a lot.

The visuals are deliberately muddy and simple. I’m not sure if the stylised aspect of it is intentional or just a convenient way to hide the low quality models and textures. It’s a shame there’s very little in the way of game or UI customisation options but I know there’s a fairly active mod scene that probably addresses a lot of my issues.

And Lethal Company is still in Early Access so it’s possible it will improve upon all of its features going forward, but given how infrequently and unsubstantial the updates appear to be, I wouldn’t bank on it. For the eight quid we each paid for it I’m sure my friend and I will get some value out of it though.

Lethal Company, at the time of review, is a cheap and cheerful and undoubtedly amusing little co-op game. There’s fun to be had but also a lot of room for improvement. I’m sure it’s something we’ll return to now and then if we fancy a change of pace from our regular Phasmophobia games.

6/10

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds (BETA)

As a big fan of Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed I was eager to give Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds a spin to see how it compared. As far as a BETA goes, this was very polished and smooth and I didn’t encounter any issues when playing online. The game looks great. It’s bright, colourful, but pretty easy to read even amidst the chaos. And ‘chaotic’ is how I’d best describe playing CrossWorlds.

Item spam is pretty crazy when playing online or with harder AI settings, and this BETA didn’t even give us access to the top tier AI difficulties. Item effects are popping off all around you practically from start to finish. That . . . might need to be a little toned down, because right now, it feels like item usage / management is actually far more important than the actual driving.

It’s not unusual to be leading a race and go from 1st to 12th and then back again all within the space of ten seconds or so because of items being used against you, only for you to use them back and regain your position. Transformed spaced out item pick ups far more and only let you carry one at a time so their usage had to be more considered, whereas CrossWorlds lets you carry two and pick ups are found on nearly every turn.

Handling is pretty good, but you need to make sure you turn off any drive-assists. Drifting feels a little more . . . rigid, I guess, than in Transformed, but it’s something you learn to manage. I actually downloaded Transformed again and played through a few tracks to better compare and . . . yeah, I think I do prefer the handling in Transformed, but there’s not a lot in it, and they’re both fun.

I also really liked Transformed for the Sega nostalgia angle and whilst I’m sure CrossWorlds will delve into Sega history for various racers and tracks, the game is set up to do what so many big and successful live service games do these days – crossover IP. They’re already announced Minecraft, SpongeBob SquarePants and Pac-Man. It’s a clever way to expand the appeal of your game and open the door to all kinds of other crossovers regardless of platform.

The ‘gimmick’ I guess of CrossWorlds is how you seamlessly switch between tracks during a race. It does help keep things fresh because you never know what track you’ll be racing on for the next lap. Visually, CrossWorlds looks great and runs flawlessly, at least from what I experienced. I also like the vehicle customisation and the gadgets that provide various modifiers to play with.

Overall, although I can’t say I didn’t enjoy this BETA I do feel, frankly, like I could just go back and play Transformed again because I’m more interested in the Sega stuff than this other IP and also because I think the item / race balance is far better. I like to feel that my driving skill is what ultimately wins a race, not how lucky / unlucky I am when it comes to items.

I’m also not sold on the price which feels a tad steep, but I guess it’s not that unusual these days. So yeah, I’m kind of on the fence with this one, but we’ll see how it shakes out and what new content they add. And also if they find a better balance when it comes to driving skill versus item usage because it’s a little too messy right now.

Gallery: Stellar Blade

Battlefield 6 (BETA)

I really enjoyed Battlefield V. The movement and shooting felt great. I thought the maps were really good. I loved the destructibility and how it completely transformed the battlefield, directly affecting the progression of the fighting. And I really liked the fortifications system which also fundamentally changed how the map came to play over the course of the fight. Which is why I was so eager to play Battlefield 2042 – at least until I tried the BETA and realised it was kind of f**king terrible.

Spin on to today and a BETA is now available for Battlefield 6. After the massive disappointment of 2042, could 6 win me back over? After sinking about 15 or so hours into this BETA across two weekends in August I’d say my answer is . . . I’m not convinced. Not quite.

The movement and shooting certainly feel good, and I really like the weapon customisation. And the game looks fantastic, without a doubt. But my big issue with the BETA was the maps. There’s a ton of destructibility to the maps but – unlike Battlefield V – the destruction doesn’t really change the ebb and flow of the battle.

It feels more like (admittedly impressive) eye candy, rather than something that truly has a substantial impact upon the gameplay. Yes, you can demolish the front of buildings . . . but those buildings still stand and the ‘corridors’ of the map remain exactly the same from beginning to end.

This wasn’t really the case in Battlefield V in which you could level entire structures and then build significant fortifications within the ruins. There’s no fortifications system in 6 though, which does make some sense given the setting, but it’s a missing component to what made V so compelling. I mean, couldn’t we have had sandbags at least?

And the maps in this BETA all felt . . . small. I don’t know if the full game will feature larger maps, but these maps felt like they were straining to contain a full server of players. The maps felt designed to funnel opposing teams into quite linear, narrow corridors. Ground vehicle use was very limited, and air power use was practically non-existent.

Now, this was a BETA so there’s going to be a degree of confusion as players learn the maps, learn how weapons handle and how best to utilise the various pieces of equipment. Early BETA play is always a tad chaotic. But even so, Battlefield 6 feels just a little too chaotic. There’s so many angles to cover, so many little pathways winding around the main channels. And because the maps are so small and players are everywhere you feel like you’re getting shot from seven directions at once.

It felt, I hate to say it, more like a Call of Duty match at times. I don’t think the TTK is too fast – I think the problem is that there’s no real ‘break’ from one combat encounter to the next due to the size and design of the maps. As soon as you spawn you’re fighting, killing and dying before you can even catch a breath.

Conquest, as a mode, is chaotic by nature, but Breakthrough – one of, if not my favourite mode in BFV – should be more controlled, more deliberate and more orderly with clearly defined points and paths to attack and defend. But in BF6, Breakthrough feels just as chaotic as Conquest and once again, I think it’s the small maps that are to blame.

My least favourite map was Liberation Peak in which you can spawn and see a thousand stars staring back at you – the stars being sniper scopes because the map is far too open and if you stick your head out of what little cover there is it’ll be blown clean off in seconds.

So yeah, not really a fan of the maps so far. I don’t hate them or anything, they just all feel so small and those ‘battlefield moments’ when the chaos of the sandbox comes together to produce a spectacular scene feel very few and far between. It now just feels like another standard shooter. But this is only a BETA so we’ll see how the game and its other maps shape up on release.

Now Playing: The Alters

In The Alters you play as Jan Dolski, the sole survivor of a deep space mining mission that’s gone disastrously wrong. Stranded on a hostile planet full of dangerous anomalies and the unrelenting approach of a sunrise that will incinerate everything in its path, Jan must find a way to survive and escape – but he won’t be able to do it alone.

Jan is going to need help and that’s where his ‘alters’ come in. Using the quantum computing technology of a mobile mining base combined with the special properties of the element ‘rapidium’, Jan can create clones of himself – but not just clones. These ‘alters’ are tailored by the quantum computer (QC) to fulfil specific roles that Jan cannot – a technician, a doctor or a scientist for example.

By analysing Jan’s life, the QC can create ‘branch’ life paths for the clones, giving them the necessary skills. The alters are created to be used like tools – not people. But they are people, and they’re all Jan. Or rather, they’re like an alternative version of Jan who made different choices in their life.

The Alters is one of the most unique games I’ve played in a long time. There’s a third person exploration aspect as you take Jan out onto the planet’s surface to locate and harvest the various resources you need, but also to investigate and overcome obstacles in your path. The game is split into three main acts, each of which takes place in a new location on the planet.

Each location is visually distinct and more expansive (and challenging to navigate) as you progress. Each also features new anomaly types to contend with. You’ll have to research and develop new tools in order to advance and escape the approaching sun. But everything you do costs resources, so you’ll also need to locate resource nodes and set up mining installations across each location and assign either Jan or his alters to operate them.

But when you return to your mobile base, the game switches tack to a base building and people management sim. You’re given a 2D side perspective of the base. This is where Jan and his alters live and work. It’s their home and their refuge from the radiation and anomalies on the surface and it’s also their only chance of escape.

As you progress through the game you’ll be able to expand the base, constructing new modules to gain access to new base functions – some required to produce the tools or resources you need to survive such as a workshop or a greenhouse – but others to improve the lives and moods of your alters such as personal accommodation or social spaces.

The alters are Jan, but they’re also not Jan and they don’t all necessarily get along with each other or with Jan himself. They’ve all ‘lived’ different lives and have different perspectives on life and on how to approach the situation they all find themselves in. And those are perspectives that Jan can learn from. Through his alters he can see all the different ways his life could have gone – for better or worse.

Expanding the base takes resources. A bigger base requires more resources to maintain. More alters require more food. The base management aspect of The Alters is a balancing act of various priorities – figuring out how to maximise your available resources, deciding what to research, what to build or where to assign your alters. Because if you can’t keep your base stable and operational and if you can’t keep your alters happy then they will turn against you.

I really love the story and character aspects of The Alters. It’s one of those thought-provoking premises that – yes, it’s been done before in other media – but it translates really well into a game thanks to the ability to give the player a choice in not only what kind of alters they want to create, but various choices throughout the story as to how they all (or just Jan) can survive and escape.

I don’t want to spoil any specific story aspects here because I think it’s best going into The Alters without knowing too much about the direction it takes but I can say I thoroughly enjoyed playing through the story and I certainly want to do a second run with a different selection of alters.

That said, I can’t say that your choice of alters in terms of gameplay progression really makes that much of a difference – you can build an infirmary without a doctor, for example, but even if you have a doctor alter, you’ll probably never need to ‘assign’ them to the infirmary because there’s never any real need to do so.

I do feel like they could have pushed the replay value more by making each alter choice more impactful upon how you progress and expand your base. The alters are all different in terms of personality and they each have their own ‘story’ to work through – but ultimately, you can assign them all to the same key roles (maintenance, mining and crafting) regardless of their specialisation.

I also have to mention a bug I hit during Act 1 that made me ‘fail’ the game despite completing the goals of an assigned task. I had to restart from scratch, losing 8 hours of play. That wasn’t super fun, but I did race back to where I was in much better shape in half the time. Once you understand all the systems of The Alters and how they connect and interact, it becomes a lot easier to manage.

Overall, The Alters is a very unique and original game that successfully combines an engaging premise with a strong narrative, great characters and a cool mix of third person exploration and base management. It’s one of those games where you can honestly say there’s nothing else quite like it and if you’re a fan of thought-provoking sci-fi then I definitely recommend checking it out.

8/10

NSO Retro: Sin & Punishment (N64)

Is the N64 retro? I guess so, but I don’t have to like it!

Sin & Punishment is a rail shooter that originally released on the N64 in 2000 in Japan, but it wasn’t officially available in the West until its release on the Wii Virtual Console in 2007. And now it’s available via Nintendo Switch Online, which is how I played it for the first time.

The only thing I knew about Sin & Punishment was that it was a rail shooter and there are certainly aspects of Sin & Punishment that remind of another rail shooter I did play and come to love back in the day – Panzer Dragoon.

You’re locked on a linear track with a rapid fire gun you use to shoot and destroy enemies that appear within your path. Your gun has two modes – a free-aim and an auto-lock. Enemies do fire their own projectiles or energy beams your way and whilst some can be targeted and destroyed, others can only be dodged.

You have a slow left-to-right movement that allows you to precisely side step incoming fire, and a quick roll that allows you to simply get the f**k out of the way. You also have a jump and double-jump ability that you’ll also use to avoid fire or environmental obstacles.

But that’s not all – you also have a powerful melee attack for enemies that get too close (and in some cases is the only way to defeat them). Your melee attack can also be used to deflect certain enemy projectiles right back at them, inflicting significant damage.

Unfortunately, the game does a terrible job of signposting which projectiles can and can’t be deflected, so there’s an element of trial and error in every boss fight (and Sin & Punishment features many mini-boss fights) in which you just have to take some hits in order to figure out what to dodge and what to deflect.

It’s a fun and effective combat system that forces you to be as focused on your own movement as you are on the enemies you’re shooting. Things can get pretty damn hectic at times as you’re faced with multiple incoming projectiles. You need to dodge fast, deflect when you can and just keep on shooting, even if you can barely see what the f**k is going on – but that’s where the auto-lock mode comes in handy.

Does it get a little too hectic at times? I’d say so. Even on the ‘Easy’ setting, Sin & Punishment can prove challenging, but fortunately you’re able to brute force your way through most things. On higher difficulties I imagine a degree of muscle memory comes into play. Your timing has to be precise and you need to know exactly what to target and when because you’re not just fighting enemies, but a stage timer that’s constantly counting down.

Take too long to defeat an enemy and your health will rapidly drain to zero. Speed is as important as precision and you soon learn that you don’t need to target every enemy or every part of a mini-boss to succeed – sometimes you just need to blast them down as quickly as you can before your timer runs out.

Sin & Punishment is a pretty short game – I cleared it on Easy in about 2 hours or so – but it does offer replay value in the higher difficulties which include additional bosses or boss stages. And it is, overall, pretty fun. It’s certainly no Panzer Dragoon, but it’s still worth checking out.

The visuals hold up pretty well, even if some parts of the game suffer from that ugly early-3D polygon clutter that can make things a little tricky to see and the character models are . . . uh, I don’t know what the f**k is going on with those but I’m sure I’ll have nightmares about them later.

And don’t ask me what Sin & Punishment is about because I really have no f**king clue. It’s completely baffling to me even after watching all the cut-scenes and reading a plot summary on Wikipedia. The dialogue is so bad and bizarre it’s kind of funny – but that’s only when you can hear it because the voices are so bloody quiet.

The game does end with you fighting a planet though so that’s pretty cool. No idea why, but who cares?