Battlefield 6 (BETA)

I really enjoyed Battlefield V. The movement and shooting felt great. I thought the maps were really good. I loved the destructibility and how it completely transformed the battlefield, directly affecting the progression of the fighting. And I really liked the fortifications system which also fundamentally changed how the map came to play over the course of the fight. Which is why I was so eager to play Battlefield 2042 – at least until I tried the BETA and realised it was kind of f**king terrible.

Spin on to today and a BETA is now available for Battlefield 6. After the massive disappointment of 2042, could 6 win me back over? After sinking about 15 or so hours into this BETA across two weekends in August I’d say my answer is . . . I’m not convinced. Not quite.

The movement and shooting certainly feel good, and I really like the weapon customisation. And the game looks fantastic, without a doubt. But my big issue with the BETA was the maps. There’s a ton of destructibility to the maps but – unlike Battlefield V – the destruction doesn’t really change the ebb and flow of the battle.

It feels more like (admittedly impressive) eye candy, rather than something that truly has a substantial impact upon the gameplay. Yes, you can demolish the front of buildings . . . but those buildings still stand and the ‘corridors’ of the map remain exactly the same from beginning to end.

This wasn’t really the case in Battlefield V in which you could level entire structures and then build significant fortifications within the ruins. There’s no fortifications system in 6 though, which does make some sense given the setting, but it’s a missing component to what made V so compelling. I mean, couldn’t we have had sandbags at least?

And the maps in this BETA all felt . . . small. I don’t know if the full game will feature larger maps, but these maps felt like they were straining to contain a full server of players. The maps felt designed to funnel opposing teams into quite linear, narrow corridors. Ground vehicle use was very limited, and air power use was practically non-existent.

Now, this was a BETA so there’s going to be a degree of confusion as players learn the maps, learn how weapons handle and how best to utilise the various pieces of equipment. Early BETA play is always a tad chaotic. But even so, Battlefield 6 feels just a little too chaotic. There’s so many angles to cover, so many little pathways winding around the main channels. And because the maps are so small and players are everywhere you feel like you’re getting shot from seven directions at once.

It felt, I hate to say it, more like a Call of Duty match at times. I don’t think the TTK is too fast – I think the problem is that there’s no real ‘break’ from one combat encounter to the next due to the size and design of the maps. As soon as you spawn you’re fighting, killing and dying before you can even catch a breath.

Conquest, as a mode, is chaotic by nature, but Breakthrough – one of, if not my favourite mode in BFV – should be more controlled, more deliberate and more orderly with clearly defined points and paths to attack and defend. But in BF6, Breakthrough feels just as chaotic as Conquest and once again, I think it’s the small maps that are to blame.

My least favourite map was Liberation Peak in which you can spawn and see a thousand stars staring back at you – the stars being sniper scopes because the map is far too open and if you stick your head out of what little cover there is it’ll be blown clean off in seconds.

So yeah, not really a fan of the maps so far. I don’t hate them or anything, they just all feel so small and those ‘battlefield moments’ when the chaos of the sandbox comes together to produce a spectacular scene feel very few and far between. It now just feels like another standard shooter. But this is only a BETA so we’ll see how the game and its other maps shape up on release.